BellSystem24

JAPANESE
HOME Sustainability Environment Climate Change Response to Climate Change

Response to Climate Change

1. Policy and Basic Concept

Individual Climate Change Policies

  • We consider climate change problems to be an important management issue.
    We have clearly stated that we will reduce the environmental impact of our operations in our environmental policy. We formulated concrete target values for the reduction in greenhouse gas (GHG) emission by 2025, 2030 and 2040 as a resolution by our Board of Directors in April 2022. We are aiming to achieve carbon neutrality by 2040 even more proactively based on the Paris Agreement and Japan's NDC.
    We view our response to climate change problems as an opportunity to grow. Accordingly, we will continue to take an even more proactive response in the future aiming to realize a sustainable society.
  • We consider achieving corporate sustainability by reducing our energy consumption and using alternative energies to be an important issue. We have set a target to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions by 30% compared to 2019 in the short term by 2025 in our latest Mid-term Management Plan (2023 to 2025) which we announced in April 2023. That target is based on our Climate Change Policy which we enacted in 2022. We will proactively work to reduce the consumption of all the energy we use and to improve our energy efficiency by transforming our business model in addition to reducing greenhouse gases.

2. Governance of Risks Related to Climate Change

  • The Board of Directors established Materiality Themes and Environmental Policy in 2019. The materiality defined environmental protection as one of the social issues to be addressed. As we observe more global actions on climate change, we are evaluating its impact on our business and society, continuing to promote aggressive measures mainly with carbon neutralization. We also established the governance system that ensures appropriate and effective management on the issue.
    • We have Sustainability Promotion Division as a dedicated permanent office headed by the Officer in Charge of Sustainability to continuously analyze risks related to climate change, develop plans and take actions, and manage effects of the actions.
    • The Board of Directors take responsibility on the issue related to climate change through assigning a director in charge of climate change. We have also assigned an officer in charge of group-wide risk management including risks related to climate change (Chief Risk Officer (CRO)).
    • Organization chart
      Governance of Risks Related to Climate Change

3. Scenario analysis and strategy

  • Our Business model mainly consists of call center types of businesses. There are about 40 call center locations. Among them, just one is our property and the others are rental facilities. Almost all business activities are carried out indoors. Our employees generally commute to their centers, but some work from home. In our model, our sales and profits are basically proportional to the number of employees and centers to a large degree.
  • The dominant factors for our greenhouse gas emissions are the electricity consumption of the centers and the employees' commutes and business travels.
  • We chose the "4℃ scenario" and the "well-below 2℃ scenario" to analyze risks and opportunities due to the future temperature increase, also referring other scenarios in order to have the better images about the world that the scenarios are suggesting. Then we evaluated our current strategy again.
Definitions of the scenarios
Scenario 4℃ scenario Well-below 2℃ scenario
Scenario's View of the World Countries are implementing measures based on the Paris Agreement, but the average temperature rises by at least 4℃. A society where a variety of phenomena that are caused by the temperature increase has big impact on businesses. The average temperature increase stays well below 2℃, and we realize an energy-related structural shift. A society where transition costs due to the shift has big impact on businesses.
Reference scenarios Transition IEA SPS (STEPS), etc. IEA NZE2050, etc.
Physical IPCC (AR6) SSP5-8.5, etc. IPCC (AR6) SSP1-1.9, etc.

「IEA World Energy Model Documentation WEO2021」
「IPCC AR6 WG II - Climate Change 2022」

Scenario analysis to update strategy

  • In either scenario, we have concluded that there is no significant negative risk to our finances in the short term (~ 2030) or in the medium to long term (~ 2040). We believe that our business model has extremely little impact on or from the environment.
  • On the other hand, we will continue to actively respond to climate change issues, sincerely considering social responsibility and the ideal model of making a profit.
  • Suggestions for our strategy
    • The decrease in demand due to rising prices because of the increasing transition cost is minor.
    • Reduced availability of the centers due to physical damages caused by disasters will remain within controllable margins.
    • The direct impact of temperature rise on demand and profits for our services is small. On the other hand, we have to strengthen control over the impact of our possible inadequate responses to climate change issues on brands and recruitment.
    • Overall, we see opportunities outweigh risks if our business has a proactive attitude on climate change.
Scenario Analysis - Risks and Opportunities
Risk Item Examples Analysis (to 2040) Impact Action policy
Risks Opportunities Risks Opportunities
Transition risks Policies Tighter regulations/ Expansion of disclosure obligations Increased energy efficiency
  • Cost increase due to introduction of carbon tax
- Small / None
  • The amount of carbon tax would be about 0.1% of our sales. It is not likely to exceed it because the buildings and transportation system in the future will be decarbonized.
Technology Switch to low-carbon technology / Investment losses from new technologies Development of low-carbon technologies (no stranded technology assets)
  • Stronger customer preferences by expanding operations utilizing low-carbon technologies
None / Small
  • It is unlikely for it to become a major differentiator as competitors seems to reach the same level.
Markets Consumer behavior change / Price surge for raw materials Access to new markets
  • Increased electricity costs due to higher energy prices
- Small / None
  • The cost of renewable energy for carbon offset will higher, but the level of impact should be very small.
Reputation Consumer preference change/ Criticism from society Credibility increase by proactive attitude on climate change
  • Damage on reputation due to belated response to decarbonization
  • Credibility increase by proactive attitude on climate change
  • Positive impact on recruitment and employee turnover rate
Small / Small
  • As our plan is at the same level as other companies, the risk of reputation deterioration is small.
  • Assuming a more active stance
Physical risks Acute Extreme weather increase and aggravation More value from business resilience
  • Sales decline and cost increase of recovery for the facilities affected by the disasters such as heavy rainfall, strong typhoons
  • Outsourcing business growth with improved BCP functions that is resilient for disasters
Small / Small
  • Scheduling to evaluate disaster maps, altitudes, and past disasters at each location
  • Expansion of Work From Home type business model
Chronic Higher average temperature and sea level
  • Lower productivity for outdoor operations
- Small / None
  • Recognize as the strategic factor that it will be a risk if the number of contracts for outdoor work increases in the future

4. Risk management

Identifying risks related to climate change

  • The Sustainability Promotion Division collaborates with each division to identify risks and opportunities, evaluate financial impact, and carry out regular reviews.
  • We evaluate the impact on our company by industry, referring to the risk analysis results of our customers' industries such as the beverage industry (increased sales of beverages), the pharmaceutical industry (increased sales of products for infectious diseases), the food industry (rising prices of raw materials), and the energy industry (significant changes in business structure).

Relationship with company-wide risk management

  • We manage risk by linking the company-wide risk management system under the control of the Risk Management Division with the risk management related to climate change under the control of the Sustainability Promotion Division.
  • In terms of risks related to climate change, based on the analysis of the Sustainability Promotion Division, both divisions jointly evaluate the importance and impact and develop countermeasures. The results will be reported to the Sustainability Promotion Committee, which is chaired by the Representative Director.
  • The Sustainability Promotion Committee reports important issues to the Board of Directors at least once a year.
  • Medium-term and long-term plans are revised based on the decisions made by the Board of Directors on risks and opportunities, and roadmaps are revised as well.

Introduction of an internal carbon pricing scheme (ICP scheme):

  • We have introduced an internal carbon pricing scheme (ICP scheme). We use the ICP scheme to convert into costs greenhouse gas emissions arising from large-scale capital investment and to create economic incentives to reduce emissions. We will promote low-carbon investment in our business activities and expand our initiatives to achieve our emissions reduction targets by adopting the ICP scheme as the basis for selecting equipment and making investment decisions. In addition, we will strive to raise awareness of decarbonization within our company and to expand these initiatives in our daily operations.
  • We will appropriately set the ICP every fiscal year referring to the numerical values in IEA documents.
    FY2023: 7,000 yen per t-CO2

5. Metrics and targets

  • We aim carbon neutrality by 2040, based on the Climate Change Policy. The target and result for each fiscal year will be disclosed regularly.
  • We support the Paris Agreement and are actively working towards carbon neutrality by 2040 to achieve a world that limits global warming to 1.5℃.

    Our Climate Change Policy and Participating Initiatives(PDF)

    Greenhouse Gas Reduction Targets and Progress*1
    Target Progress
    50%*2 reduction by FY 2030 Achieved against the target*3 as of the end of FY2023
    • *1 Scope of aggregation : Scope1-3
    • *2 Base Year : FY2019
    • *3 Target : 20% reduction from the base year
  • In order to achieve carbon neutrality, we simultaneously promote activities to reduce energy consumption and to fully utilize clean energy such as solar power generation and wind power generation.
  • Target to reduce energy consumption (electricity used at facilities)
    The Target is to reduce energy consumption by at least 1% annually.
    Energy Consumption Reduction Record
    FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 Average Change in Intensity over Five Years
    Intensity concerning the use of energy 0.04308 0.04111 0.04 0.0393 0.0378
    Year-on-year comparison (%) 95.4 97.3 98.3 96.2 96.8
  • We are disclosing the risks and the opportunities related to climate change and the impact on our company in line with the recommendations of the TCFD.
  • We have obtained SBT 1.5℃ certification (certified in December 2023)
  • We have been disclosing information to the CDP since 2022.
  • Renewable energy has already been installed in the head office, Chubu, Kobe, Tohoku, and other locations, totaling 10 sites, since the fiscal year 2022 (Actual results for FY2022: 8.17 million kWh / by the end of February 2023).
  • Kobe Solution Center had already installed renewable energy in FY2022, and Matsue Solution Center has been installed since March 2023.

6. Initiatives in Which We Are Participating

Initiatives

Support for the TCFD (Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures) Recommendations

TCFD
We have expressed our support for the recommendations of the TCFD. In line with the recommendations, we are collecting, analyzing and disclosing the necessary data about the impact of climate change risks and opportunities on our business activities, strategies and financial plans.

Science Based Targets initiative(SBTi)

Science Based Targets initiative(SBTi) Science Based Targets initiative(SBTi)
The SBTi is an international initiative that certifies Science Based Targets (SBTs). The SBTs are greenhouse gas emission reduction targets scientifically consistent with the targets established by the Paris Agreement. Four organizations - the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF), CDP, World Resources Institute (WRI) and United Nations Global Compact (UNGC) - jointly established the SBTi. The SBTi encourages companies to set reduction targets based on scientific evidence toward the target of limiting the global average rise in temperature to 1.5°C compared to before the Industrial Revolution. We were certified in December 2023.

Support for "COOL CHOICE"

COOL CHOICE
We expressed its support for COOL CHOICE, the national campaign for realizing decarbonized society.

7. Data

Third-party Verification

We believe it is important to disclose highly transparent and reliable environmental information. Accordingly, we have had the data we disclose verified by a third party since FY2022.
SGS Japan Inc. has conducted a third-party verification in compliance with the ISO14064-3 international standard for calculating greenhouse gas emissions on the data marked with a below.

FY2022:Verification Opinion(1.29MB/5P)

Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Scope 1 + 2 Greenhouse Gas Emissions(t-CO2) FY2019(Base Year) FY2020 FY2021 FY2022
Scope 1 Vehicles (which run outside of the sites) 6 4 5 5
City gas 124 92 77 64
Scope 1 Subtotal 130 96 82 69
Scope 2 Electricity and Heat (hot and cold water) 10,085 10,665 11,009 9,544
Reduction by non-fossil certificates 0 0 0 -3,068
Scope 2 Subtotal 10,085 10,665 11,009 6,476
Scope 1 + 2 Total 10,215 10,761 11,091 6,545
  • *Scope of aggregation: Contact center in Japan of our company and group companies
  • *Third-party verification (): Scope 1 (excluding off-site moving vehicles) and Scope 2 (before reduction with non-fossil fuel certificates) CO2 emissions and energy consumption
Scope 3 Greenhouse Gas Emissions(t-CO2) FY2019
(Base Year)
FY2020 FY2021 FY2022
Category 1 Purchased goods and services 11,910 13,840 12,720 17,419
Category 2 Capital goods 6,509 6,744 7,009 6,777
Category 3 Fuel and energy related activities 1,702 1,811 1,757 1,795
Category 4 Upstream transportation and distribution 398 557 357 525
Category 5 Waste generated in operations 7 7 4 4
Category 6 Business travel 1,323 303 363 1,303
Category 7 Employee commuting 6,078 5,756 6,171 7,606
Scope 3 Total 27,927 29,018 28,381 35,429
  • *Scope of aggregation: BELLSYSTEM24 Holdings, Inc. and BELLSYSTEM24, Inc. excluding some categories (Category 2: Scope of consolidation / Category 5: Head office only / Category 6: Including emissions from overnight stays during business trips from FY2022)
  • *Third-party verification (): CO2 emissions in categories 1 to 7 of Scope 3 (categories 8 to 15 are not applicable due to the characteristics of our business)

Performance Data

Electricity Consumption(1,000 kWh) FY2019 (Base Year) FY2020 FY2021 FY2022
Non-renewable energy consumption 19,376 20,424 21,314 13,570
Call Center / Office 17,896 19,094 20,116 12,438
Data Center 1,480 1,330 1,198 1,132
Renewable energy consumption 0 0 0 8,170
Call Center / Office 0 0 0 8,170
Data Center 0 0 0 0
Total 19,376 20,424 21,314 21,740
FY2019 (Base Year) FY2020 FY2021 FY2022
GHG Emissions per megawatt-hr(t-CO2/1,000kWh) 0.52 0.51 0.52 0.27
Renewable Energy Rate(%) 0 0 0 37.6
FY2020 FY2021 FY2022
Violation of environmental laws and regulations Violation of environmental laws and regulations 0 0 0
Accidents and pollution causing environmental problems 0 0 0
Complaints about environmental issues 0 0 0